Wednesday 22nd May 2013,
The Silhouette

Why aren’t more women running to be MSU President?

 

When former MSU President Mary Koziol read the list of candidates running this year, her first instinct was to e-mail Suzan Fraser, who was president in 1988.

“Seven people running, not a single woman” was the gist of the message.

The lopsided ratio this year has raised eyebrows, but it’s not extremely unusual at this university. Historically, more men than women have run in MSU elections, and there have been other years when no women ran—1994, for example, saw 12 candidates vying for the position, all of whom were men.

When Koziol won in 2010, she was the first in 22 years to break a streak of male presidents – something she still feels is an important accomplishment.

“I thought, we need to break the streak but we also need different models of leaders out there. People need to see that you don’t have to fit a certain mold – and it’s not just about being male. A lot of people think leaders must be very outgoing, aggressive, assertive, charismatic – none of which I particularly identify with,” she said.

When she was involved in student politics, Koziol was often described as being passive.

“I think it was very assumption-based. At the SRA table, for example, I didn’t speak a lot, but that’s not because I didn’t have opinions. That’s not the same as being passive. I’m a very passionate person – I’m very assertive when it’s called for.”

Koziol is among only four women presidents elected in the history of the MSU. The three others are Ann Blackwood (1979), Suzan Fraser (1988) and current president Siobhan Stewart.

Like Koziol, Stewart has noticed the buzz around the skewed ratio this year.

“I’ve had people bring it up to me—both men and women,” she said.

The issue was also raised at the debate held in the Student Centre on Tuesday.

“People are excited when you represent them. If the electorate is diverse then you would want to see candidates being diverse,” Stewart said.

But the shortage of women running doesn’t mean there’s a lack of interest among potential female candidates.

“I know women who have considered running and in the end chose to back a male friend,” said Stewart. “Anybody can technically apply, but there are other barriers.”

It’s hard to pinpoint why more female students at McMaster don’t go out and get signatures for nomination.

Various factors could be at play in the choices women make, or don’t, about running: how women are socialized to deal with public scrutiny and view positions in political office is one of them.

“The student body has demonstrated that people are willing to vote for a strong female candidate – I don’t think there’s discrimination there necessarily,” said Koziol.

“I think the larger problem is the way we socialize men and women that leads to more men running. When women run, they have a really good chance of being elected – but they don’t [run].”

Koziol and Stewart were each the only woman running in their respective elections, which were a year apart.

“I was told repeatedly not to put women’s issues at the forefront of my platform,” said Koziol “I think that’s an interesting dynamic — that it’s okay to be female and run for an election, but you have to be careful about how proud you are about being female.”

Both she and Stewart recognized that running or being known as “the girl” in an election can lead to tokenization, although being the lone woman didn’t deter them from winning.

Stewart said she knows why she gets recognition for being a black female president, but she wants it to “not be noteworthy.”

“I’m not sure I want to be ‘the female representative’ or ‘the black representative,’ said Stewart. “You should pick your candidates based on platform and values, not gender.”

Stewart and Koziol agreed on the notion that an MSU policy to increase female representation may not work in practice, the idea being that a woman could be criticized for winning a seat because she was a woman and not because she was deserving of the seat.

“For me it doesn’t solve the bigger problems,” said Stewart.

The underrepresentation of women extends beyond the MSU to all levels of government. In Canada, women occupy roughly 22 per cent of seats in the House of Commons. The percentage is marginally higher (about 23 per cent) on municipal councils and in provincial legislature.

“I don’t think the discussion [of underrepresented women in student politics] would occur naturally within the student body. The broader society would need to change first,” noted Koziol. “I think the most important work the MSU can do is through forums.”

For women who’ve thought about or are considering running for MSU president, Koziol has some advice to offer.

“I would say, number one, seek out a mentor. You need a support system,” she said. “I’d like to see women really question why they’re not going for stuff like this. I think it’s a tricky thing to navigate: could you actually not do this, or do you just think you don’t fit the mold?”

 

6 Comments

  1. Zachary Strong January 31, 2013 at 3:29 pm

    Focusing on just this one MSU Presidential election seems awfully shortsighted. Any set of statistics, if spun cleverly, can make any situation seem dire.

    I’m going to risk controversy here by putting things in perspective…

    Off of the top of my head, the following positions are/were occupied by women. I’m sure this list is not extensive.

    At an MSU Level:

    - 2010 MSU President
    - Current MSU President
    - Current MSU Services Commissioner

    At a Faculty Society Level:

    - 2011, Current, and 2013 Engineering Society president
    - Current Humanities Society president
    - Current Nursing Society president
    - Current Kinesiology Society president
    - Current Science Society president (and most of the exec)
    - Although the Soc Sci president is male, the other 6 members of their executive are all female

    It would seem that although all seven MSU Presidential candidates HAPPEN TO BE male THIS YEAR (by the way, the only serious contenders are David Campbell, Jacob Brodka, and James Dowdall), there is no shortage of female representation at the Faculty Society level.

    Not to mention that 60% of the university population is female, AND a Women’s & Trans* Centre is in the works, AND there is an entire university department dedicated to Women’s Studies and Feminist Theory.

    Perhaps there would be value in examining why women are so successful at the faculty society level instead of creating a moral panic based on one MSU-level election.

    And maybe we could take those insights and attempt to replicate that success at an MSU level.

    It’s also worth pointing out that this dialogue implicitly assumes that the MSU Presidency is the most desirable position on campus. In reality, it’s an incredibly demanding position that does not fit into the majority of student’s career plans. The position could pay $100,000 and I still wouldn’t want it.

    Perhaps the majority of women at McMaster find other ways of improving this campus that fit better with their lives and career plans. Like being a faculty society president instead of running in the MSU Rat Race.

    And here’s some additional food for thought…

    Maybe, just maybe, and I’m being optimistic here, we could examine the challenges, misperceptions, stereotypes, and (sometimes) discrimination that Engineering students face when interacting with the rest of campus. They are tangible, they are real, and they are pervasive.

    I have often been told that I am particularly friendly “for an engineer”. If I was black, and was told that I was awfully friendly “for a black person”, the prejudice would be painfully apparent. I would argue that the discrimination that I have faced (and overcome) over the past five years has deterred many other Engineering students from interacting meaningfully with the rest of campus.

    It would be interesting to see the last time an Engineering student has been elected MSU President – its been a long time, that’s for sure.

    I totally agree that MSU Presidents tend to be skewed from a certain demographic. However, to cherry-pick the gender issue from a cornucopia of issues does a disservice to everyone’s attempts to make the McMaster campus a diverse and friendly space, especially when the argument presented sidesteps the fact that women are well-represented in leadership positions throughout the university.

  2. Concentric Carl February 6, 2013 at 12:26 am

    While I don’t sit on any SRA executive or have had little experience hearing about it, I hardly believe that the lack of women (particularly in recent years) is due to some sort of gender discrimination. I think its just a prevalence of interest that happens to be more common among men.

  3. A.R. February 7, 2013 at 10:44 am

    Ugh, where do I even start. You realize that by simply stating those statistics, you are perpetuating the very fact that women are not represented in high levels of student government, right? There is a HUGE difference between faculty society elections and MSU Presidentials. SCALE is the first thing that comes to mind. I’d be interested in how many faculty society presidents are acclaimed… and even what voter turn out is per faculty. Running for MSU President cannot be compared, even in the least.

    Also – when you spoke about “At the MSU level” you quoted 3 people. THREE. How is there even an argument here? Let’s take a real look at the MSU, shall we?

    MSU BoD
    2007-08 – 1 female
    2008-09 – 1 female
    2009-10 – 0 females
    2010-11 – 1 female
    2011-12 – 2 females
    2012-13 – 1 female.

    …. over the course of 6 years, 6 females have been represented out of 24 positions on the MSU Board of Directors. 2011-12 was a HUGE year because it was the first time the MSU had more than 1 female *gasp* [note: sarcasm]

    Anyway, I could continue with SRA, faculty societies, etc. etc. but I don’t have all that data on hand, and it probably won’t dissuade you much. I don’t know how much you can compare a person’s race/gender to the faculty you are studying in, but good luck with that.

    • JC February 7, 2013 at 2:14 pm

      On point again, AR.

    • Zachary Strong February 7, 2013 at 6:56 pm

      A.R: Thank you for reading the first 10% of what I wrote and ignoring the rest. I appreciate that you ignored the fact that I offered those observations as part of an overall solution to the diversity problem that you perceive.

      And extra-special thanks for downplaying and marginalizing my experience as a member of an identifiable group on campus.

  4. Elise Milani February 7, 2013 at 2:16 pm

    I think one of that largest problems is that the SRA doesn’t have very many women on it. Most BOD members come from the SRA. It’s not that women aren’t running for the SRA. We see in many faculties that women are overwhelmingly running, but not getting elected. We need to change the stigma on campus that women leaders have.

Leave A Response