The great send-off debate

William Lou
October 17, 2014
This article was published more than 2 years ago.
Est. Reading Time: 5 minutes

Spend elsewhere

By: Eric Gillis

Recently, a proposal was put forward to the Student Representative Assembly by current President Teddy Saull, asking that the SRA vote to allow the MSU spend a whopping $215,000 on a “year-end celebration.”

Or, in other words, a gigantic party. A huge, expensive party that costs you $215,000 of your money. To the proposal’s credit, there are “cheaper” options, but all of them, save for the absolute “cheapest,” are in the six-figure range and even the cheapest one is a superbly inexpensive $95,000 of your money.

And the kicker? You’d still have to pay for tickets. So not only is this proposal suggesting we should spend a huge sum of your money on a party, but that you should have to pay a fee on top of it to attend the events of this party.

The proposal does acknowledge that this is a “substantial amount” of money, but then goes on whimsically waxing poetic of dreams in an attempt to reassure everyone that it’s all okay. You see, the proposal informs delightfully: we, as an organization, have a surplus. And we shouldn’t have a surplus, because we’re a non-profit organization. Hence, this huge expensive, gigantic, party will help us get rid of our surplus like any good non-profit student government should strive to do.

This is indeed true. A non-profit should absolutely be striving to not have a surplus. I agree with the sentiment entirely, as I’m sure most of my fellow SRA members do. But I want to talk about priorities.

Consider the following: why is it that we can apparently manage to pull something like this off with a six-figure price tag in a mere four months, yet we are evidently incapable as an organization of getting even a rudimentary implementation of a women’s centre on campus in a timely manner without significant bureaucratic mess and delay? How is it that an absolutely massive party is a more easily accomplished endeavour? For over three years now there has been an active movement to make the Women and Gender Equity Network happen – this is not a new conversation. So where’s the women’s centre?

What about your financial needs? Don’t you wish there was a little more emergency financial aid available? The MSU could be providing that. If we have a surplus we need to be getting rid of couldn’t we be helping our fellow McMaster students in need? Wouldn’t that be more in line with what we should be doing as an organization?

Further, didn’t Union Market raise its prices on coffee recently? Aren’t some of the prices on goods in Union Market, like chips, overpriced? If we’re making a surplus, do we need to be charging those prices? The same goes for TwelvEighty. If we have a surplus we need to get rid of, couldn’t we be charging a little less and actually put together some healthy nutritious meals for students on a budget?

And what about our student employees? We pay most of them a wage that is well below the poverty line. Yet, we have a surplus that we evidently need to get rid of. So, why don’t we strive to pay all of our student employees a living wage? This would help our fellow student employees with their school fees and, given our financial situation, would be a prudent financial decision. Why not invest in our employees?

The answer to these questions is quite simply: priorities.

Money well spent

By: Daniel D'Angela

The typical Student Representative Assembly meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. “O Canada” is played by 6:45 and the next two to four hours are spent talking about various issues regarding governance and post-secondary education.

All pretty exciting stuff in my opinion, but I will admit it’s not a page-turner. However, this Oct. 19, the meeting will be very different. At this upcoming SRA meeting, your student representatives will be voting on allocating $215,000 from the MSU to a spring McMaster Send-Off concert.

I will be voting in support of this allocation. An expenditure of his size comes with many legitimate concerns and questions that I will try to address.

The first concern is that the MSU should be funding services, instead of recreational events. The MSU is one of the most important service providers for students. This past fiscal year, the MSU spent more than $3.5 million on over 20 student services, from the Child Care Centre to EFRT. These services greatly enrich student life, and make McMaster a safer and more inclusive community.

We also have one of the strongest Campus Events staff in the country; hosting shows of such international acclaim as Steve Angello and Lil' Jon.

We are not forced to make a choice between great entertainment and great services. Fun events and investing in student-run events are not mutually exclusive, and our record proves that.

Another concern is that spending so much money on a concert is financially irresponsible. Over the last three fiscal years the MSU has run a $1.5 million surplus and this year a projected $130,000 surplus.

We currently have over $5 million in reserves in cash and near-cash assets. According to our own comptroller Maggie Gallagher, “the success of the past three years has put the organization in a very healthy financial position.

The year-end celebration is a financial risk that we are ready to handle.” After accounting for projected ticket sales, we would lose at most $90,000 for the MSU, still leaving a healthy $40,000 projected surplus in 2014.

In our constitution, it states that we will “draw into a true society all students at McMaster University” by “foster[ing] activities and events which will enhance the University experience of its members and contribute to the life of the University as a whole.” Nothing better outlines and clarifies why this concert would be such a boon to McMaster and its students.

This concert would bring together over 6,000 students, making it the largest event in our history. It would change the game, not only at Mac, but all Canadian universities. It would it provide a phenomenal experience to at least a quarter of our members, provide value to members who traditionally are not always targeted by our services, create a new tradition, and build campus pride.

To provide one last piece of encouragement for this motion: our last concert sold out in 36 hours and 2,000 students attended. Our Welcome Week concerts routinely have over 5,000 attendees and cost $50,000 each. Now imagine what we could do with $215,000.

The options

  1. The MSU will allocate $215,000 to Campus Events for a year-end celebration. Projected bottom-line loss (after ticket sales and revenue): $90,000
  2. The MSU will allocate $170,000 to Campus Events for a year-end celebration. Projected bottom-line loss (after ticket sales and revenue): $70,000
  3. The MSU will allocate $95,000 to Campus Events for a year-end celebration. Projected bottom-line loss (after ticket sales and revenue): $45,000
Subscribe to our Mailing List

© 2024 The Silhouette. All Rights Reserved. McMaster University's Student Newspaper.
magnifiercrossmenuarrow-right